Category Archives: Welfare Reform

Two Birds, One Blog – Journey into Politics

I am a bit perturbed by the attitude of or current government. It is true, the area i come from has been predominantly Labour for quite some time now and growing up my personal political views may have been coloured by growing up in a not majorly but non-the-less Labour family. However, growing up, i did the normal childish things and ignored the back and forth and posturing of PMQ’s, rolling my eyes whenever my great gran or gran would change the channel from cartoons to a room full of boisterous and yelling old men. Leave it up to the old people and go harass the cat, that was the routine.

A decade and a bit later, i have come to my political awakening. What once was the realm of the older generation has been passed onto me. It’s been a slow start to be fair. Primarily setting up this blog to document my time on the Work Programme to let others know about how these companies run and how they treat their “Customers”, but in light of the events over the past couple of weeks, in relation to the Welfare Reform Bill, NHS Reform Bill and indeed, the Work Programme, it has become apparent that my little blog about how the WP is run is clearly a tiny part of a much bigger machine.

Read the rest of this entry »


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

So I’m a Job Snob?

I am angered and upset.

According to the Employment Minister, Chris Greyling, I am a “Job Snob”, defined as a person who is able to work, but is particular in which vacancies and jobs interest them. I.E. Selective. Well, forgive me for having an idea about which career I want to excel in. This doesn’t mean I’ve been passing up opportunities for other types of work. My daily job search ranges from Cleaner vacancies to Web Design (even though I can do it, I have no qualifications to go with it). With this broad range of search, time and time again I come up with the same barriers which stop me from actually applying to some posts, the top three being:

2) ENHANCED CRB REQUIRED. Now this one is strange, because in my experience, CRB costs are usually met by the employer. However more and more jobs which require CRB are asking for the payment to be met by applicant. I can’t afford it.
3) Not enough hours compared to the cost of transport to get to work making my potential wage suffer OR the location of the job is within my 90 mins travel to work area, but would mean having to get three buses or two buses and a train, which would mean I’d spend a hefty amount of my potential wage on transport costs and would be no better off.

Luckily, however, my town is pretty much central to three other major towns in my area and the city which is only one bus ride away.

To get to the main point of why I’m writing this.

Chris Greyling has branded anyone against the Mandatory Work Activity, Workfare and Work Programme a job snob. He is confident in the fact that he has many high street retailers working with him on providing work placements for thousands of unemployed people, yet large national companies and charities are beginning to leave the scheme, what’s now a trickle could become a flood. Tesco have asked for clarification that the schemes are actually voluntary in response to vast public pressure to get the company to leave the Workfare scheme.
Critics of his schemes have compared them to “Slave Labour” , an accusation Greyling has vehemently denied, maintaining his stance that the work placements will help thousands of people back into work and is aiming to increase such placements to 100,000 by the end of the year, whilst failing to realise that a DWP Report into other schemes like the ones under way in the UK are more likely to REDUCE the likelihood of gaining employment.

I am not against the idea of Work Experience for young people. Any teenager or school leaver who willingly approaches an employer and asks for work experience should be given that opportunity. I am not against the idea of Volunteering. People who want to better themselves by Volunteering for local and national causes should be hailed as honourable and valuable members of their communities. However I am against the idea of people working for their benefits. Being paid what the need to live on for doing the same job as an employee of a company for less than minimum wage. Every story, anecdote and newspaper article I read of peoples experiences on Workfare bring images of Victorian-esque poverty, family’s forced to live in one room of a house because they had the “luxury” of a spare room and were made to move. Disabled people being hidden away for their own safety and dignity due to high media propaganda that paints these people, who are some of the most vulnerable people in our society, as benefits scroungers, someone on the train the other morning actually said “If you can move your arms, you should be able to work”. That is ultimately the way we are headed and it won’t be the romanticized, abridged, HD ready Dickensian poverty we see on TV.

Finally, I ask, what is the government doing to actually create jobs in the UK? All I have seen for the past six month’s is an attack on people claiming benefits and the NHS, I haven’t once seen anything to actually create a job in local or national press. At the same time, I wonder that if companies like Tesco, Argos, Matalan and Burger King can find space for Workfare “Customers”, then why not offer these people a job instead of throwing them back into the system at the end of their placement? Or are you reaping the benefits of a conveyor belt of unpaid staff?

I dunno. Confusing.

1 Comment

Posted by on February 19, 2012 in Unemployed Life, Welfare Reform, Work Programme


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Very good information RE Work Experience, Manditory Work Activity and the Work Programme.

Ipswich Unemployed Action.

A new blow for the Government with its Work Programme, Community Action Programme, Mandatory Work Activity and Work Experience schemes as it has been suggested that the jobseekers being placed on mandatory placements through statutory legislation are in effect Crown employees.

Regardless of being assigned to the premises of an company (we prefer not to say employer in such context) or the street:-

  • there is no employment contract expressly written, verbal or implied between the worker and the company;
  • no payment in cash or in kind from said company;
  • jobseekers on the employment programme schemes are statistically employed; and
  • such appointment is exercised through statutory instrument (of an Act of Parliament)

Thus these workfare workers are employees of the Crown, an employee of the State and a public sector worker (regardless if you are operating in a private sector environment) – this is what workfare is all about, working for…

View original post 70 more words


Tags: , , , , , ,


I have been thinking something over since my group “Appointment”. I didn’t include it in my original blog about it, because i didn’t know how to tackle this kind of issue, as i’ve never had to tackle something like this before.

My view in creating this blog was primarily to focus on the Work Programme and how effective it is, however i’m beginning to notice that the WP is just a smaller wheel in a much bigger network of cogs (hence the gravitar lol).

Whilst waiting for my “Appointment” to begin, i noticed a young gentleman sitting next to an older woman. Nothing strange there. It wasn’t until this gentleman’s was called into the “Appointment” that i realised this woman was in fact the gentleman’s mother and his carer. As his name was called, he glanced at his mother, who uttered under her breath “I’m not allowed in, love, i’ll be right here, go on, you’ll be fine.”, the look of worry on his face was plain to everyone, but she smiled encouragingly at him and said he’d be fine once again.

We all got through the 10 minute “Appointment” without fault and left the building (something else that annoy’s me, we were meant to tour the office to find out where the facilities and fire exits were, we didn’t).

The reason why i am thinking a lot over this is because i know that in the past, people on programmes such as New Deal were assessed and given help based on their level of “Job Readiness” and so forth, with this, a culture of “Parking and Creaming” grew up, in which the “Customers” who were further away from being job ready were parked and not much assistance given and the “Customers” who were closer to be getting job ready were creamed for a faster result and pay-off. Apparently that won’t happen under this system as the providers are paid for a successful end result, i for one can see thousands being parked. Having worked with unemployed people being moved onto JSA from DLA, i’m wondering if there are any effective procedures in place to make sure that these people (many with hidden mental illness) are looked after and given the appropriate care whilst on the WP or if they should even be on the WP at all.

I’m wondering and i’m worried. If there are no provisions and networks of support in place for some of the most vulnerable people in our society, how far behind will they be before the Providers and the Government realise they’re lost?

Sorry if this makes no sense, as i say i’m constantly thinking about this and my minds all frazzled about it.

1 Comment

Posted by on February 5, 2012 in Welfare Reform, Work Programme


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

%d bloggers like this: